Russia Kicks Out Biden Diplomats As America Nears “Dead President” Crossroad Revolution

> News > Russia Kicks Out Biden Diplomats As America Nears “Dead President” Crossroad Revolution

President Putin warning NATO and the United States yesterday that any deployment of troops or missiles in Ukraine would cross a “red line” and “prompt a military response”, and him stating: “The emergence of such threats represents a ‘red line’ for us…I hope that it will not get to that and common sense and responsibility for their own countries and the global community will eventually prevail”, says this warning was joined by Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova grimly reporting to the world: “The Armed Forces of Ukraine are increasing their military force, pulling heavy equipment and personnel, and the number of troops in the conflict zone already reaches 125,000 people, and this, if anyone does not know, is half of the entire composition of the Armed Forces of Ukraine”.

With reality-based factual articles like “Russian Forces Are Growing…In Russia! Pentagon Awkwardly Downplays Ukraine Invasion Hype” now appearing, this report notes, Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden keeps ratcheting up his war propaganda, best exampled yesterday when his Secretary of State Antony Blinken hysterically warned: “Any escalatory actions by Russia would be of great concern to the United States, and any renewed aggression would trigger serious consequences”—an hysterical warning met by Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko stating: “I will suggest that Russian President Vladimir Putin return nuclear weapons to Belarus, those atomic armaments would be the most effective in such a case…I am not saying this for no reason, we are ready for this on the territory of Belarus”—and in quick response to this statement, saw Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov saying about President Lukashenko’s nuclear weapons placement offer statement: “I would take this statement as a very serious warning, which is dictated, first of all, by the reckless policy pursued by the West”.

Quickly joining these events, this report continues, it saw top NATO diplomats discussing anti-Russian sanctions in case of “aggression against Ukraine”—a war move Russia immediately responded to by kicking out of the country socialist Biden Regime diplomats, whose order read by Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Zakharova states: “By 31 January 2022, employees of the US embassy in Moscow who have been on assignment for more than three years must leave Russia…We tried long and hard to reason with them and direct them to some constructive solution to the issue, but they made their choice”—and in response to this anti-Russian war move sanction threat, saw Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Zakharova stating: “We know perfectly well what lies behind this kind of approach, it’s the inability to use legal methods to maintain a competitive struggle – if it is what they think it is, or healthy competition as we call it…We understand that it is one of the tools they use to implement their foreign policy…We realize that it shows their own weakness and they need to realize it, too”.

A few minutes after Russia kicked these socialist Biden Regime diplomats out of the country, this report details, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg suddenly declared: “Ukraine is not a member of NATO, and therefore the US-led bloc cannot guarantee that it would fight on its behalf in case of Russian military aggression”—a declaration joined by British defense chief General Sir Nick Carter being replaced, who warned about an “accidental war with Russia” –then it saw OPEC rebuffing socialist leader Biden and telling him they won’t increase oil production to bail him out—after which it saw 15 of the Free States in America threatening to pull over $600-billion from US banks if they keep supporting Biden’s insane energy policies.

As the socialist Biden Regime reels from crisis to crisis, this report continues, it’s now attempting to steady itself by unleashing fear hysteria propaganda about the new Omicron variant of Covid—hysterical fear the World Heath Organization countered with its statement: “Full travel bans won’t stop coronavirus and can adversely impact global health efforts during a pandemic by disincentivizing countries to report and share epidemiological and sequencing data”—an Omicron variant the African nation of Botswana reports its fully vaccinated citizens have only mild symptoms of when infected by it, and those who are unvaccinated show no symptoms at all—sees top Russian virologist Dr. Anatoly Altshtein at the Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology saying this new variant could “spell the end of the Covid pandemic”, with his stating: “We already see Omicron has many mutations, more than Delta…More than thirty in a single gene of its spike protein…This is too many, and it means the virus has an unstable genome…As a rule, this sort of infectious agent becomes less dangerous, because evolutionarily, an overwhelming number of mutations leads to a weakening of the virus’s ability to cause disease”—and sees concurring with Dr. Altshtein top American research scientist Dr. Houman Hemmati, who yesterday explained how the Omicron variant could “speed up the end of Covid pandemic”, and stated: “If Omicron is highly infectious but doesn’t cause major disease, it could provide many people with antibodies…Imagine lots and lots of people, including currently vaccinated people get it and it’s impossible to avoid…All of a sudden, you can have a scenario where you have a large subset of the population, if not the entire population, who has gotten a mild version or even no version of the disease, but has developed antibodies and has resistance such that if there ever, later on, comes a more deadly variant, you’re protected”.

With hospital nurses across American today grimly reporting the Covid patients are dying from treatments, not the disease, this report notes, it bears noticing that world renowned British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra is shockingly reporting that researchers are refusing to publish a supporting study showing that experimental Covid vaccines are linked to massive increases in heart attacks—are experimental Covid vaccines as dangerous as they are worthless, as evidenced over the past day by fully woke and fully vaccinated NBA basketball legend LeBron James, who just tested positive for Covid—and as evidenced by fully vaccinated NFL coach Mike McCarthy, who along with at least 9 of his fully vaccinated players have all just tested positive for Covid—are dangerous and worthless experimental Covid vaccines being forced on the American people by socialist leader Biden and his top medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci—the same Dr. Fauci that American political icon Robert F. Kennedy Jr. beyond shockingly revealed killed 85 orphan minority children in the 1980s by forcing them against their will to take experimental chemo drug treatments, all of whom were buried in mass graves at the Gate of Heaven Cemetery in Hawthorne-New York—and are horrifying facts about this demonic monster making it no wonder why Fox News investigative journalist Lara Logan just reported about Dr. Fauci: “This is what people say to me, that he does not represent science to them, he represents Josef Mengele, the Nazi doctor who did experiments on Jews during the Second World War in concentration camps”.

This transcript sees Security Council Members noting that the last time America suffered a full-on socialist onslaught like it is experiencing now was during their despotic reign of President Lyndon B. Johnson, who died on 22 January 1973—is the most critical and consequential date in modern American history, as on this day the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in the Roe v. Wade case on 22 January 1973 permitting the demonic killing of innocent babies in their mothers’ wombs—saw this case being partially supported by the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision this high court handed down on 29 June 1992—today sees this high court hearing arguments in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case that seeks to overturn these two previous decisions—about which that places America at a crossroad in defining itself the three top official “newspapers of record” in America are now reporting:

The New York Times:

It was an all-hands-on-deck moment for the movement to defend abortion rights.

On Sept. 1, the Supreme Court stunned much of the country by passively allowing Texas Senate Bill 8 to take effect, banning most abortions in the state in obvious defiance of Roe v. Wade.

Not quite 24 hours later, the court issued an actual decision confirming that it would not block the law.

The Washington Post:

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday in a case testing the constitutionality of a Mississippi law banning abortions 15 weeks after a woman’s last menstrual period, in flagrant violation of both the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling and the court’s 1992 affirmation of Roe, Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

The court should strike Mississippi’s law, first, because a person should have a right to choose whether to carry a pregnancy to term.

This is perhaps the most private and individual decision anyone can make, and the constitutional principles of dignity and autonomy demand that people be given space in which to make it.

Mississippi would eviscerate this right, and upholding the state’s ban would call into question many other bedrock constitutional liberties Americans enjoy.

The Wall Street Journal:

The Supreme Court takes up its most important abortion case in years on Wednesday, and the question will be how the Justices maneuver their way out of a thicket they should never have entered 50 years ago.

Will the Court, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, settle for an incremental ruling that upholds a Mississippi ban on abortion after 15 weeks, or will it overturn its misguided precedents and return the regulation of abortion to legislatures in the states?

Roe in particular is one of the worst decisions in the Court’s history, on par with Plessy v. Ferguson (“separate but equal” on race) and Korematsu (internment camps for Japanese-Americans).

At a stroke, the Court overturned 50 state laws and turned abortion into a pitched political battle that nonetheless could not be settled politically through the ballot box.

That mistake has distorted American politics and law for a half century.

It has heightened political polarization and made the Supreme Court a partisan battlefield.

With nowhere else to turn, abortion foes have looked to the Court for redress, and abortion proponents have returned the disfavor.

Abortion is the Oz behind the curtain of every Supreme Court nomination as partisans try to divine how the nominee will vote on the issue.

Yesterday, this report notes, White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters that socialist leader Biden is “deeply committed to the constitutional right established in Roe” and believes the Mississippi law “blatantly violates the constitutional right to safe, legal abortions”—then it saw socialist Democrat Party lawmaker US Senator Jeanne Shaheen threatening: “I hope the Supreme Court is listening to the people of the United States because I think if you want to see a revolution go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is of the public, particularly young people”.

The conclusion section of this transcript sees Security Council Members agreeing that if any revolution happens because this high court strikes down Roe v. Wade, it will have been caused by socialist propaganda, and not by anything having to do with fact or reality, specifically because “the law before the high court today focuses on protecting the unborn, not restricting women”—is a law that in no way whatsoever restricts a woman’s right to have an abortion, rather it asks that unborn babies in their mothers’ wombs be given the same rights every human being is afforded under the US Constitution and the United Nations Charter of Human Rights the US is a signatory to—is a right for unborn human life this high court confirmed in its Webster v. Reproductive Health Services decision, handed down on 3 July 1989, that upheld a Missouri law acknowledging that life begins at conception and granting unborn children rights in contexts other than abortion, such as criminal, tort and inheritance laws—and in the 32-years since this high court handed down its Webster decision, the case they’re hearing today notes scientific advancements since then now confirm that “between the fifth and sixth weeks following conception, the unborn child’s “heart begins beating”, in approximately the eighth week the child “begins to move about in the womb”, at nine weeks, “all basic physiological functions are present” along with teeth, eyes and genitals, at 10 weeks, “vital organs begin to function”, at the 11th week, the “diaphragm is developing” and the child begins moving “freely in the womb”, by the 12th week, the unborn child “can open and close his or her fingers, starts to make sucking motions, and senses stimulation from the world outside the womb” having “taken on ‘the human form’ in all relevant aspects”, and if not confirmed to be human beings by this high court, would justify the killing of the elderly, whose helpless and dependent ending days are exactly like those evidenced by unborn helpless and dependent babies in their mothers’ wombs.